Most often, this issue arises when a subject matter expert is promoted or moved into a management position. Although the titular change occurs almost immediately, learned behaviors die hard and as a result the newly minted manager continues to try to be the expert. While it may be possible to continue such a "dual citizenship" role for a short period of time, one of two things will eventually happen :
- The manager spends too much time being technical, resulting in poor management and/or leadership
- The manager spends too much time being managerial, resulting in a decaying technical expertise that becomes a drain on the larger group of experts and a poor reflection of his leadership skills.
One of my favorite bloggers, Jeff Haden, writes :
A newly minted manager (or an old salty one, for that matter) operating in this mindset has opportunities to positively influence his team each and every day. Looking back, I can think of several managers who had small comments, observations, and insights which at the time seemed small and perhaps even trivial but have had a large impact on me. The insights they shared with me helped to clarify several aspects of my career and helped me to develop a focus on what it was I wanted to do (which, ultimately, isn't to move into traditional management by the way - I much prefer technical leadership). I'm not sure a manager who proclaims himself to be the foremost expert would have the same impact."Whatever we are today is largely due to the words and actions of other people. Most of those words or actions were, at the time, small and seemingly inconsequential."
Understanding the different roles that expertise and authority play within a team, either business or military, serves to grow both the authority figure as well as the technical experts. Failure to do so generally leads to, well, failure.
What role do you see yourself in today? What about tomorrow?
In my company, you might as well have an Amber Alert when someone gets promoted. They're never seen nor heard from again. And cease making any significant difference.
ReplyDeleteWhy is that? It must be at least tangentially related to the Peter Principle.
ReplyDelete